 |
| January 2008
Alliance Action |
1) Bridger-Teton
National Forest not out of the woods in 2008
2) No excuses to miss giving Comp
Plan input this month
3) Grand Targhee, Teton Meadows
Ranch lead county news
4) County and town affordable housing
regulation updates
5) Town to consider condo conversions,
5-Way and Pine Glades
6) Wyoming wolf management gets
down to details
7) State Game and Fish wants comments
on bison management
8) Conservation Alliance 2007 Annual
Report available online
9) Coming Events
10) Valley Echoes
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • •
1) Bridger-Teton
National Forest not out of the woods in 2008
Plans to drill more than 100 gas wells on the
Hoback Rim near Bondurant and the possible relocation
of the Bridger-Teton supervisor’s office
out of Jackson are only two of the many BTNF
issues to watch this year.
HOBACK WELLS -- On Dec. 10, the Forest Service
published a "notice of intent" to study
new plans by Plains Exploration and Production
Company [PXP] to build 136 or more gas wells
on 17 pads in an ecologically sensitive area
leased by the company at the north end of the
Wyoming Range of the Bridger-Teton. Comments
to help officials determine the scope of this
project's environmental impact statement are
due by Feb. 7.
Forest officials
have scheduled two open houses on this
new proposal during January:
Jan. 28, 4 to 8 p.m., in Jackson at the Virginian
Lodge, 750 W. Broadway, and
Jan. 29, 4 to 8 p.m.,
in Pinedale at the Sublette County Public
Library, 155 S. Tyler.
The
new EIS will replace one
that was to analyze only the drilling of three exploratory
wells. About 19,000 people commented on the original
EIS this past spring -- almost all were opposed to
drilling in the forest. In June, PXP asked Forest
Service officials to expand their environmental analysis
and let the company develop all the leases it owns
in the Upper Hoback area instead. The company’s
CEO has said that he hopes to find natural gas
reserves there on par with the highly industrialized
Jonah Field south of Pinedale.
Your comments concerning this proposal are critical.
As outlined, the project would disturb at least
400 acres in an area that includes Hoback River
headwaters, crucial habitat for threatened species,
summer ranges and birthing areas for big game,
and important migration corridors for mule deer,
elk, moose, lynx and pronghorn. PXP's plan includes
building and/or upgrading more than 29 miles
of roads in one of the largest backcountry areas
of the Bridger-Teton, the 315,647-acre Grayback
Ridge roadless area. The proposal also comes
at a time when legislation to protect the Wyoming
Range from oil and gas drilling is pending in
Congress. For a fact sheet about the current
proposal, visit www.jhalliance.org/Library/Alerts.HobackWells.1-08.htm.
Visit www.jhalliance.org/Library/Alerts/HobackWells.8-07.pdf for
background information.
Please attend one of the public meetings listed
above, and email your scoping comments by the
Feb. 7 deadline to: comments-intermtn-bridger-teton@fs.fed.us with "PXP
Master Development Plan" in
the subject line. Or mail them to Greg Clark,
District Ranger, Big Piney Ranger District, P.O.
Box 218, Big Piney, WY 83113.
MORE ON THE BTNF MOVE -- In response to complaints
about the Forest Service’s decision to “evaluate
options” regarding moving the Bridger-Teton
National Forest supervisor’s office from
Jackson to Pinedale, Afton or Alpine, regional
forester Harv Forsgren has scheduled two public “listening
sessions” in February:
Feb. 6, 6 to 8 p.m., Afton Town Hall, 416 N. Washington
St., and Feb. 7, 6 to 8 p.m., Jackson Hole High School
cafeteria.
Forest Service officials’ assurances
that the Jackson Ranger District will remain
in town regardless of where the supervisor’s
office ends up don’t answer many other
questions, such as:
How would moving Bridger-Teton’s headquarters
affect working relationships with its partners
-- Grand Teton and Yellowstone national parks,
the National Elk Refuge, the Game and Fish Department
and local governments?
What would this move mean to the effectiveness
of the many commercial and environmental interests
-- including the Conservation Alliance -- that
work regularly with the forest?
How would this impact the 50-some local forest
employees and their families? How would losing
these community members affect Jackson Hole?
What could happen to the valuable public land
-- up to 15 acres just north of downtown -- that
would have to be sold in Jackson? Would all the
money generated from the land sale actually end
up building a new headquarters and employee housing,
or would it be siphoned off to some other forest
and its projects?
Please attend one of the meetings noted above
to tell officials what you think, and consider
writing these people with your concerns:
Ms. Gail Kimbell, Chief
USDA-Forest Service
1400 Independent Ave., SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-8333
Mr. Harv Forsgren, Regional Forester
Intermountain Forester
324 25th St., Ogden, UT 84401
Please also consider asking Wyoming’s
congressional delegation to continue their efforts
to help in this matter:
U.S. Sen. Barrasso
senator_jbarrasso@barrasso.senate.gov or
307 Dirkson Senate Office Building, Washington,
D.C. 20510, (202) 224-6441
U.S. Sen. Mike Enzi
379 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington,
D.C. 20510, (202) 224-3424,
Email via: http://enzi.senate.gov/email.htm
U.S. Rep. Barbara Cubin
1114 Longworth, HOB, Washington, D.C. 20515,
(202) 225-2311,
Email via: http://www.house.gov/cubin/zip_auth.shtml
BRIDGER-TETON MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISION UPDATE
-- Since 2005, Bridger-Teton officials have been
working on a long-range management plan to guide
energy development and other land-use decisions
regarding the forest. The B-T’s plan was
originally due out in 2008, but the planning
process has been on hold since last spring, when
a federal judge ruled that the Forest Service
had to reinstate environmental reviews during
the revision of forest management plans. In response,
the Forest Service released a draft environmental
impact statement in August on the planning process
itself, and this month, the final EIS on this
federal Forest Planning Rule is expected, with
a Record of Decision to follow about a month
later. The preferred alternative in the draft
EIS was virtually identical to the Bush administration
forest planning rules the judge overturned in
March, so it’ll be interesting to see if
public comments saying that this alternative
would significantly reduce protective measures,
scientific rigor and public input on Forest Service
plans had any effect. Regardless, Bridger-Teton
officials say they expect this document to provide
the direction they need to resume the B-T management
plan revision process this spring. We hope to
have more details for you in next month’s
Alliance Action.
HELP PROTECT THE FOREST AND SNAKE HEADWATERS
-- Of all the threats facing the forest that
surrounds Jackson Hole, none could cause greater
harm to wildlife, the environment and our tourism-based
economy than energy development. This past fall,
U.S. Sen. John Barrasso introduced federal legislation
that, if passed, would prohibit future oil and
gas leasing on the Wyoming Range of the Bridger-Teton
National Forest. Based on work begun by the late
U.S. Sen. Craig Thomas, the Wyoming Range Legacy
Act of 2007 would also allow buybacks of exploration
and development rights already sold to energy
companies, which could be an option to avert
the proposed PXP development described above. Please
visit www.wyomingrange.org for up-to-date information
on efforts to protect the Wyoming Range.
The Snake Headwaters Legacy Act, a visionary
bill to include about 400 miles of rivers and
streams in northwest Wyoming in the National
Wild and Scenic Rivers System, is also pending
in Congress. (Visit www.jhalliance.org/Library/Alerts/SnakeRiver.8-07.pdf for
details about it.)
Please help increase the chances for success
for both bills by sending a note of support to
the members of Wyoming’s congressional
delegation. (Their contact information is given
above.)
BTNF MOTORIZED TRAVEL PLAN UPDATE -- Unrestricted
motorized use is currently allowed on more than
250,000 acres of the northern part of the Bridger-Teton
National Forest during the summer and fall. That
use has resulted in miles of user-created trails,
disturbed wildlife, habitat degradation, the
spread of noxious weeds and increased soil sedimentation
in trout streams. A draft environmental impact
statement on a travel plan to address these issues
was due out this month, but forest officials
now say it won’t be ready until March.
We’ll keep you posted. Details about the
Off-Highway-Vehicle plan are available at www.fs.fed.us/r4/btnf (click
on “North Zone Travel Plan Revision”).
Visit www.jhalliance.org/Library/Alerts/BTNFmotorplan.4-07.pdf for
background information.
GOLD MINING ON THE B-T? -- Bridger-Teton
officials say they will likely approve a request
from the owners of a mining claim in the Gros
Ventre River drainage to spend 75 days this year
digging exploratory pits to look for gold, silver
and platinum. In November, Jackson District Ranger
Dale Deiter said the claim owners have sought
permission to dig 15 to 20 12-foot-deep test
holes on a 5-acre parcel on Cottonwood Creek.
Should the site prove commercially profitable,
the owners could then seek to expand the mining
operation to more than 340 adjacent acres. Dieter
said an 1872 mining law would make it difficult
for the Forest Service to deny the test project,
which could be allowed under a categorical exclusion,
a project considered too small for environmental
review under the National Environmental Policy
Act. Stay tuned for more on this as it progresses.
For a
ton of information about the General Mining Act
of 1872 and current efforts to reform it, visit
www.earthworksaction.org/1872.cfm.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
2) No
excuses to miss giving Comp Plan input this
month
The Jackson/Teton County Comprehensive Plan,
which guides our community’s growth and
development, is being revised and this month
offers many chances for you to comment. Your
input is vital to help protect Jackson Hole’s
character, wildlife and scenery. It’s up
to all of us to voice our concerns and ideas,
so we can collectively create a better Comp Plan
that truly protects what makes Jackson Hole special.
Please speak up! Visit www.jacksontetonplan.com for
details and to submit comments on the website
blog (click on Public Input, then on Get Involved,
then on Join the Plan Blog). You may also email
your comments to feedback@jacksontetonplan.com.
During the first part of January, county planners
will travel to Alta, Hoback Junction and Moran
to make it easier for residents there to voice
their opinions regarding the update. Here are
the dates, times and locations:
Jan. 8, 6 p.m., Alta Elementary School
Jan. 10, 6 p.m. Hoback Junction Fire Station
Jan. 10, 6:30 p.m., Moran Elementary School
On Jan. 14, a special Latino outreach presentation
on the Comp Plan is scheduled for 6 p.m. at Teton
County Library, 125 Virginian Lane.
On Jan. 24, the Conservation Alliance is hosting
an open house from 5 to 7 p.m. at our office,
685 S. Cache, to share the data we’ve compiled
to help with the Natural Resource Overlay and
Comp Plan revisions, and to encourage the public
to participate in update process.
Then at the end of January, Clarion Associates,
the Comp Plan consultant, will return to Jackson
to present various land use scenarios based on
the work that's been done so far at these additional
meetings:
Jan. 30:
Stakeholder Advisory Group, 10:30 a.m. to 12:30
p.m., 4-H Building, 255 W. Deloney
Public Meeting, 6 to 8 p.m., St. John’s
Episcopal Church Parish Hall, 170 N. Glenwood
Jan. 31:
Technical Advisory Group, 10:30 a.m. to 12:30
p.m., 4-H Building, 255 W. Deloney
Joint Information Meeting, Jackson Town Council
and Teton Board of County Commissioners,
3 to 5 p.m., Town Council Chambers, 150 E. Pearl
Joint Town & County Planning Commissions,
6 to 8 p.m., Town Council Chambers, 150 E. Pearl
For more information on the Conservation
Alliance’s involvement
in the Comp Plan update, contact Community Planning
Director Kristy Bruner at (307) 733-9417 or kristy@jhalliance.org.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
3) Grand
Targhee, Teton Meadows Ranch lead county news
The Conservation Alliance is monitoring many
county private lands matters. Here's a brief
roundup of meetings at which you may share your
concerns; you may also email county comments
to commissioners@tetonwyo.org.
(All times and dates are subject to change --
please call Teton County at (307) 733-8094 for
confirmation.) For details on all community planning
issues, contact Kristy Bruner at kristy@jhalliance.org or
(307) 733-9417.
GRAND TARGHEE GRINDS TOWARD CONCLUSION -- The
next Teton Board of County Commissioners meeting
regarding the fate of Grand Targhee will be held
in the Commissioners’ Chambers, 200 S.
Willow, at 9 a.m. on Tuesday, Jan. 8. (This hearing
has been continued to Feb. 4, same time and
place.) This meeting will give people their first
opportunity to comment on the most current two-dozen-plus
conditions of approval for resort zoning for
Targhee. After months of deliberations and hours
of meetings where the public could only observe,
this will be the best and perhaps the last chance
for you to speak up. The latest version of the
conditions hasn’t
yet been posted on the Teton County website, www.tetonwyo.org/plan,
but should be available soon.
The Conservation Alliance continues to ask for
a smaller resort, more protection for the surrounding
public lands, a no-pet restriction and more protected
open space within the region. Specifically, we
urge the county to not exceed the 450 units proposed
and we ask that this number include all employee
housing. Our goal is to have the number of units
decreased to about 300. We urge that no more
than 10 percent of the lodging units be single-family
dwellings, and no more than 10 percent be cabins
and townhouses. The overall floor area of the
commercial resort services and amenities should
not exceed 120,000 square feet, as opposed to
the 150,000 square feet now proposed. We continue
to support strong air and water quality monitoring
and mitigation plans, and to ask for more than
the proposed 299 acres of protected open space.
We also continue to ask for more than the $500,000
being offered to offset impacts to county infrastructure.
All told, the Conservation Alliance strongly
believes that the resort as now proposed is too
large considering its location right next to
sensitive national forest lands and the Jedediah
Smith Wilderness Area. Please attend this meeting
and speak up to save the character of this unique
family ski resort and the public lands that surround
it, or email your comments to commissioners@tetonwyo.org.
This decision will forever impact much more than
the 120 acres of the resort; it will irreparably
change thousands of acres of surrounding public
lands and the wildlife dependent upon this fragile
alpine ecosystem.
TETON MEADOWS RANCH -- Feb. 11, 6 p.m., Teton
County Planning Commission, County Commissioners’ Chambers,
200 S. Willow -- The application for Teton Meadows
Ranch has changed, and may continue to change.
For now, a hearing originally set for the end
of January has been rescheduled for Feb. 11.
This will be the first review of the application
as part of the formal public process. On Aug.
22, Sequoia Development submitted an application
for a 500-unit development on 288 acres of the
Seherr-Thoss property in South Park. At that
time, the developer sought a zone change from
Rural to NC-2 (under which development of vacant
land can only occur if it’s considered
to be “infill” between existing subdivisions).
On Dec. 19, the developer applied for a PUD-Affordable
Housing zoning change instead. The applicant
also partnered with the Jackson Hole Community
Housing Trust to formalize “GAP” units
ranging from $440,000 to $740,000 for the development.
Density remains at 500 units, with this breakdown:
75 traditional affordable homes (priced from
$94,970 to $265,900), 50 deed-restricted lots,
275 “GAP” homes, and 100 free-market
lots. The existing rural zoning allows a maximum
of 50 homes (in the case where 70 percent open
space is secured and a density bonus is awarded).
Many of the concerns the Conservation Alliance
had regarding the original application still
remain unresolved. Key ones include:
- The proposed density is incompatible with adjacent
properties and not representative of responsible
land use planning at the broader community level.
- An evaluation of a proposal of this scale is
a big step to take outside of the current Comprehensive
Plan revision. As a community, in coming months,
we will undoubtedly be looking at South Park
planning in the update process. Smart development
is guided by strategic planning, which can only
be directed and designed by an entire community.
In short, the community should decide within
the Comp Plan revision process if development
of this scale is appropriate for this area of
South Park.
In addition, the potential for this development
to contribute to solving the community’s
affordable housing problem remains questionable.
The prices of “GAP” housing ($440,000
to $740,000) do not appear to be “affordable” pursuant
to standards defined in our land development
regulations. This determination is critical given
the applicant’s request to consider “GAP” housing
as part of the affordable housing requirement
for the PUD-AH zone change.
Please click
here for a PDF of the Conservation Alliance's
public comments on the current Teton Meadows
Ranch proposal, and click
here for a fact sheet. Stay tuned and get involved
in this important community land-use decision
by voicing your concerns to:
Blair Leist, Teton County Staff Planner on Teton
Meadows Ranch: (307) 733-3959 or bleist@tetonwyo.org
Teton County Planning Commission: planningcom@tetonwyo.org
Teton Board of County Commissioners: (307) 733-8094
or commissioners@tetonwyo.org
Andy Schwartz, Leland Christensen, Ben Ellis,
Bill Paddleford, Hank Phibbs
SNAKE RIVER CANYON RANCH -- Jan. 29, 9 a.m.,
Teton Board of County Commissioners, Commissioners’ Chambers,
200 S. Willow -- This application proposing a
shift from a lodge-based resort to a residential-scale
development at the old Astoria Hot Springs near
Hoback Junction is on its second round of review
before county commissioners. Teton County planning
staff has done an excellent job outlining reasons
that the application does not comply with our
land development regulations. In general, the
Conservation Alliance questions the following:
the increase in disturbance to Natural Resource
Overlay lands, the overall change in the development
pattern on the parcel (and the net increase of
nearly 145,000 square feet of development), and
the failure for the application to demonstrate
criteria worthy of the resort designation and
the associated density bonuses. During this second
round of the review process, the applicant has
done little to modify the application, leaving
concerns unresolved.
WILSON MIXED-USE VILLAGE SUB-AREA PLAN -- On
Dec. 10, the Teton County Planning Commission
voted to hold off indefinitely on continued discussion
regarding this plan, which stemmed from the adoption
of Chapter 8 of the Comprehensive Plan in 1999,
when Wilson was identified as an appropriate
location for a “mixed-use village.” Typically,
mixed-use villages are places where there’s
a high-density mix of commercial and residential
uses. Wilson was named because it already had
commercial elements that could help reduce vehicular
trips to Jackson for basic services, but just
what constitutes a mixed-use village in Teton
County has never been decided. In general, the
goal of the draft plan was to take the work of
previous planning efforts in 2001 and 2003 one
step further with the development of proposed
land development regulations and zoning changes,
but now that’s been tabled until further
notice.
BEAR AMENDMENT UPDATE -- To deal with an increase
in bear-human conflicts in the Jackson-Pinedale
region (up from about 35 in 2006 to about 260
in 2007), Teton County commissioners have been
evaluating regulations that would require homeowners
in certain areas of the county to use bear-proof
trash containers and reduce other bear attractants
on private land. On Dec. 18, they voted to postpone
a decision on the proposed Bear Conflict Mitigation
and Prevention Amendment until a workshop scheduled
for March.
In a related matter, at a meeting in Jackson on
Dec. 19, Wyoming Game and Fish Department officials
said they want to raise hunting quotas on female
black bears for the next three years in the Jackson
region from 20 to 28. Quotas in the Greys River
region would increase from 30 to 47 animals, and
quotas on the west side of the Wind River Range
would increase from 10 to 12. The Wyoming Game
and Fish Commission could adopt the new quotas
at its next meeting, Feb. 14 and 15 in Cheyenne.
In 2007, wildlife officers captured 26 “problem” bears
in the region, relocating 15 to remote locations
and euthanizing the remaining 11. Those deaths
did not count toward filling hunting quotas. The
Conservation Alliance is advocating for a system
that counts all human-caused deaths toward the
quotas, not just hunting kills.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
4) County
and town affordable housing regulation updates
On Dec. 18, the Teton Board of County Commissioners
approved text amendments to increase affordable
housing mitigation rates for developments in
the county from 15 to 25 percent. However, in
the Town of Jackson, a proposed amendment to
likewise increase mitigation rates has drawn
criticism from a number of landowners. To date,
the Town Planning Commission has not made a recommendation
to the Town Council to adopt the proposed amendment,
nor has it scheduled further discussion, but
we’ll post the date when it’s available.
The Conservation Alliance supports policies that
demand sufficient mitigation from developers to
offset one of the primary effects of rapid growth
-- a lack of affordable housing. The 2007 Housing
Needs Assessment, available from the Teton County
Housing Authority, recommends increasing the mitigation
rate to 40 percent. (For comparison, in Aspen,
Colo., 60 percent of new housing units are required
to be affordable.) The assessment also recommends
increasing the fees developers would have to pay
in lieu of providing affordable housing. Substandard
mitigation rates have caused pressure to allow
high-density spot zoning in inappropriate places,
risking our community’s wildlife and rural
character. For these reasons, the Alliance supports
efforts to increase mitigation and will advocate
for further commitment during the Comprehensive
Plan revision process.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
5) Town
to consider condo conversions, 5-Way and Pine
Glades
APARTMENT-TO-CONDO CONVERSIONS -- Jan.
2, 5:30 p.m., Jackson Planning Commission, Town
Council Chambers, 150 E. Pearl (Update: No recommendation
was made at this meeting, however, the Town Council
has since agreed to revisit the proposed condo
conversion rule at 12:30 p.m. Tuesday, Jan. 15,
in the Town Council Chambers, 150 E. Pearl, and
at its Jan. 22 workshop, 3 p.m., same location.
Meanwhile, Jackson Town Attorney Audrey Cohen-Davis
is preparing a legal report requested by the
council on the possibility of enacting a moratorium
on condo conversion applications. During the
beginning of January, the planning department
received proposals to condominiumize 92 apartment
units in Jackson, including the 84-unit Timbers
complex on Gregory Lane. This, coupled with the
Town Council's recent approval of developer Eric
Bedford's request to change the 56-unit Virginian
Apartments to condos, suggests that developers
are rushing to convert apartments to condos before
new regulations are adopted.)
Another item to keep an eye
on, and one strongly linked to our affordable
housing problem in Jackson Hole, is an amendment
to streamline condominium conversions in town.
If passed, condo conversion applications will
not have to go through a final development plan
process. Without this process, conversions won’t
have to abide by affordable housing mitigation
requirements that other development types must
comply with. Also, many renters who are integral
to our community, and part of the workforce,
will likely be displaced as a consequence of
the conversions.
In order to be consistent with Chapter 5, Affordable
Housing, of our Comprehensive Plan, our community
should adopt policies that preserve current housing
inventory. Town practices to streamline conversions
should not be supported, and steps to formalize
that practice in our land development regulations,
such as the proposed amendment, should not be
taken. The Conservation Alliance encourages discussion
about alternative policies that could better
work to uphold the vision of the Comp Plan.
If you’re concerned about affordable housing
in our community, please ask the Jackson Planning
Commission and elected officials to NOT support
the proposed amendment, but rather pursue policies
that will better preserve our current affordable
housing inventory. Email Mayor Mark Barron at mbarron@ci.jackson.wy.us and
the Town Council at electedofficials@ci.jackson.wy.us with
your concerns.
5-WAY INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION WORKSHOP --
Jan. 22, 3 p.m., Town Council Chambers, 150 E.
Pearl. After eight years, a plan to improve the
intersection of Broadway, Pearl Ave. and Flat
Creek Drive is nearing the home stretch, but
not without complaints that it doesn't include
bike lanes. A workshop that began on Dec. 17
was continued to Jan. 22 after many members of
the public commented on the proposed reconstruction,
which Town staff and the Wyoming Department of
Transportation reportedly designed around a "complete
streets" model. This model calls for considering
pedestrians and cyclists in transportation planning,
but so far no lanes or pathways specifically
designed for bicyclists are included. (Planners
have said that expanded road shoulders should
suffice to accommodate cyclists.) Details on
the plan are available at www.townofjackson.com (click
on "Jackson Government," then "Meeting
Agendas," then "Town Council Meeting
Agendas," then "Special Town Meeting
Agenda & Workshop, Monday, December 17," then "5-Way
Intersection").
PINE GLADES FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN -- Jan. 7, 6
p.m., Jackson Town Council, Town Council Chambers,
150 E. Pearl. (This hearing has been rescheduled
for Jan. 22, same time and place.) On Dec. 19,
the Town Planning Commission unanimously voted
to approve the Pine Glades Final Development Plan,
which now passes to the Town Council for a vote.
The Conservation Alliance recognizes that building
a 39-unit development on a prominent hillside containing
steep slopes (greater than 40 percent) is not optimal
in terms of safety or visual impacts. That aside,
landowners of other parcels in the vicinity have
been granted variances to enable use of their land.
The key issue is not about whether it's appropriate
to develop this parcel given current zoning, but
rather the degree of intensity of development that
is technologically feasible, safe, and unobtrusive
in this part of Jackson, and the town in general.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
6) Wyoming
wolf management gets down to details
Now that the Game and Fish Commission has adopted
Wyoming’s Wolf Management Plan -- and the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has approved the
plan as well, calling it an “adequate regulatory
mechanism” that meets the requirements
of the Endangered Species Act -- the next step
is setting specific regulations. Through efforts
of the Conservation Alliance, Game and Fish has
agreed to hold meetings to gather public input.
The first set is scheduled as follows:
Jan. 21 - Green River, Green River Game and Fish Regional Office, 7 p.m.
Jan. 21 - Laramie, Laramie Game and Fish Regional Office, 7 p.m.
Jan. 22 - Lander, Lander Community Center, 950 Buena Vista, 7 p.m.
Jan. 22 - Pinedale, Pinedale Library, 7 p.m.
Jan. 23 - Jackson, Antler Motel, 50 W. Pearl, 7 p.m.
Jan. 23 - Sheridan, Sheridan Game and Fish Regional Office, 7 p.m.
Jan. 24 - Casper, Casper Game and Fish Regional Office, 7 p.m.
Jan. 24 - Cody, Bighorn Federal Savings & Loan, 7 p.m.
These meetings will address two chapters within
Game and Fish regulations: Chapter 21, Gray Wolves
Designated as Trophy Game Animals, and Chapter
28, Regulation Governing Big or Trophy Game Animal
Damage Claims from wolves listed as trophy game.
For Chapter 21, comments on the following are
sought: “…(1) provide definitions
for terms used in statute and in the regulation;
(2) describe the procedure to be implemented
for monitoring gray wolf populations; (3) describe
the procedure and requirements for lethal control
of gray wolves in the trophy game area; and (4)
describe the circumstances when non-lethal control
of gray wolves may be used.”
For Chapter 28, comments are sought on: “…(1)
stipulate the process for owners of damaged property
to report damages caused by big or trophy game
or game birds; (2) provide for the dual classification
of gray wolves as either a predator or a trophy
game animal depending on their location within
the state; and, (3) establish damage payment
calculations pertaining to gray wolves (where
gray wolves are classified as trophy game animals)
causing damage to livestock.
Details including draft language for the chapter
changes can be found at the Wyoming Game and
Fish website: http://gf.state.wy.us/wildlife/GrayWolvesSurvey/index.asp.
Please attend the meeting nearest you and ask for
fewer control actions, less intrusive monitoring
and management practices, and for more wolves in
Wyoming. Ask that wolves be managed only when verified
problems exist and then only with precise actions.
Wolves should be managed like every other game
species -- for maximum numbers, not at some arbitrary
low population level. Another series of meetings
will be held sometime this spring when specific
management scenarios will be determined. Check
future Alliance Action newsletters for more information
and visit www.jhalliance.org/issueswolves.htm for
background.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
7) State
Game and Fish wants comments on bison management
On Dec. 14, Wyoming’s Game and Fish Department
released its draft Jackson Bison Herd Brucellosis
Management Action Plan, which outlines four goals:
Reducing the population of the bison herd and
sustaining the population objective; maintaining
habitat; minimizing risk of brucellosis transmission
from bison to cattle by decreasing co-mingling;
and vaccinating bison against the disease with
strain RB51, or a better vaccine if one is developed.
Fewer bison spread out on more productive habitat
will help reduce the risk of brucellosis in the
herd, so there’s little objection to reducing
herd numbers, maintaining habitat or decreasing
the risk of disease transmission by keeping bison
and cattle separated. However, bison vaccination
is a controversial aspect of the plan. Current
studies do not show strain RB51 to be more than
minimally effective in reducing abortions caused
by brucellosis or limiting transmission of the
disease in bison. While there might be an argument
that “some is better than none,” the
biggest drawback to this plan is that there's
no effective and efficient method of administering
the vaccine to bison. The draft plan and a link
to submit comments are available at:
http://gf.state.wy.us/wildlife/brucellosis/BisonComments/index.asp.
Using the form provided by Game and Fish, comments may also be mailed by the
Jan. 18 deadline to:
Wyoming Game and Fish Department
Attn: John Henningsen
P.O. Box 67, Jackson, WY 83001
The Wyoming Game and Fish Department also plans
to ask state Game and Fish commissioners to change
the Jackson bison herd target population number
to 500, based on a recommendation from the recently
released Bison and Elk Management Plan and EIS
on the National Elk Refuge and Grand Teton National
Park. In 1998, Game and Fish set a herd target
number of 350 to 400; the current size of the
herd is about 1,200. It’s thought that
culling the herd to 500 bison will still ensure
genetic diversity while reducing impacts to habitat
and elk herd health. Commissioners will vote
on this at their meeting in Cheyenne on Feb.
14-15. For more information and to submit comments,
visit http://gf.state.wy.us/wildlife/BisonComments/index.asp.
Comments may also be sent by the Jan. 17 deadline
to:
Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Wildlife Division
Attn: Barbara Duke—Bison Herd Objective
Comments
5400 Bishop Blvd., Cheyenne, WY 82006
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
8) Conservation
Alliance 2007 Annual Report available online
A PDF of the Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance’s
2007 Annual Report is now available at www.jhalliance.org/Library/Reports/JHCAAnnualReport.12-07.pdf.
The report includes the Alliance’s financial
information from fiscal year July 1, 2006, to
June 30, 2007, as well as lists of our top 10
accomplishments of 2007 and top 10 goals for
2008, making it a great way to get all the highlights.
You can also pick up a printed copy at the Alliance
office, 685 S. Cache.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
9) Coming
Events
“Listening to Cougar” Book Talk
Friday, Jan. 4, 5:30 to 8 p.m., Images of Nature Gallery, 170 N. Cache
Marc Bekoff, Cara Blessley Lowe and Ted Kerasote will read selections from “Listening
to Cougar,” an anthology about mountain lions that reveals the presence --
both on the land and in our psyche -- of one of nature’s most secretive
creatures. Refreshments will be served and part of the proceeds from book sales
during this free event will go to support the Cougar Fund. Call (307) 733-0797
for more information.
Our Local Bighorn Sheep -- Conservation Alliance
Info Lunch with Steve Kilpatrick
Wednesday, Jan. 16, 12 to 1 p.m., Conservation
Alliance conference room, 685 S. Cache
Have you ever wondered how long bighorn sheep
have been wandering these mountains? Would you
like to know more about these interesting ungulates?
Please join us for a brief history of the Jackson
and Targhee bighorn sheep herds, and an update
on Wyoming Game and Fish’s management plan.
Bring lunch, and we’ll provide drinks and
snacks.
Comprehensive Plan Open House
Thursday, Jan. 24, 5 to 7 p.m., Conservation
Alliance conference room, 685 S. Cache
Come find out about the new useful data the Jackson
Hole Conservation Alliance has been compiling
to help with the Natural Resource Overlay and
Comp Plan revision. This will also be a great
chance to voice your questions and concerns.
Please click here for details.
Rosie’s Ridge Cross-Country Ski with Dick
Klene and Louise Lasley
Saturday, Jan. 26, all day, Rosie’s Ridge
In
2005, in response to Alliance and community efforts,
the Wyoming Department of Transportation’s
engineering team rejected a proposal to reroute
the Togwotee highway through ecologically sensitive
Rosie’s Ridge near Moran. Spend the day exploring
this preserved area on cross-country skis and celebrate
our community’s success! All levels of skiers
are welcome, but please bring your own gear. Contact
the Alliance at info@jhalliance.org or
(307) 733-9417 for details if you’re interested
in participating.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
10) Valley
Echoes
“Cheers to a new year and another chance
for us to get it right.”
- Oprah Winfrey
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
Alliance Action is a publication of the Jackson
Hole Conservation Alliance. The Jackson Hole
Conservation Alliance is dedicated to responsible
land stewardship in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, to
ensure that human activities are in harmony with
the area’s irreplaceable wildlife, scenic,
and other natural resources. The Alliance is
a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) organization.
(If you no longer wish to receive this e-newsletter,
please send a note saying you’d like us to
remove your email address from our list to: allianceaction@jhalliance.org.)
|