 |
| October 2007
Alliance Action |
1) State
Game & Fish Wants Wolf Plan Comments by Oct.
10
2) Get Involved in Comprehensive
Plan Update
3) Decisions Pending on Affordable
Housing Requirements
4) County Postpones Grand Targhee
Vote till Oct. 16
5) Local Development Issues Abound
6) WYDOT Seeks Input on Hoback Junction
Reconstruction
7) County to Reconsider Bear-Proof
Trash Containers
8) Forest Planning Rule Comments
Due by Oct. 22
9) Sen. Barrasso Pledges to
Protect Wyoming Range, Snake Headwaters
10) Heli-Skiing Controversy Continues
11) Upcoming Events
12) Valley Echoes
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • •
1) State
Game & Fish Wants Wolf Plan Comments by
Oct. 10
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service could remove
Rocky Mountain gray wolves from endangered species
protection as early as Feb. 2008, and state officials
want to make sure Wyoming’s wolves are
included in the delisting. In September, the
Wyoming Game and Fish Commission released for
public comment a draft plan for managing wolves
once they’re delisted. A compromise between
what state legislators wanted and what Fish and
Wildlife wanted, the plan commits Wyoming to
maintaining only 15 breeding pairs of wolves.
It also stipulates that wolves will be managed
as trophy game in the northwest corner of the
state and as predators subject to being shot
on sight or worse everywhere else. Information
on the plan and comment forms, due by Oct. 10,
are available at http://gf.state.wy.us.
Comment online or via mail to: Wolf Comments,
Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 5400 Bishop
Blvd., Cheyenne, WY 82006.
Although Wyoming Game and Fish commissioners are
expected to adopt the plan without changes during
their next meeting on Nov. 15, your comments could
have an influence as they begin their next step
in early December -- outlining regulations for
hunting wolves as trophy game. Please visit www.jhalliance.org/issueswildlife.htm and
click on "Managing Wyoming’s Wolves"
and "Endangered Species" for background information
to bolster your comments.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
2) Get
Involved in the Comprehensive Plan Update
The Jackson/Teton County Comprehensive Plan,
which guides our community’s growth and
development, is being revised. Your input is
vital to help protect Jackson Hole’s character,
wildlife and scenery. Although the next public
meetings aren’t scheduled until November,
it’s important for you to get involved
now. Town and county officials and consultants
from Clarion Associates want to hear your thoughts
and concerns about our current Comprehensive
Plan. Right now, they’re looking for answers
to these questions: “Is the 1994 vision
for the community still valid? If not, what would
you change or add?”
It’s up to all of us to voice our concerns
and ideas, so we can collectively create a better
Comp Plan that truly protects what makes Jackson
Hole special. Speak up! Visit www.jacksontetonplan.com for
details and to submit comments on the website
blog (click on Public Input, then on Get Involved,
then on Join the Plan Blog). You may also email
your comments to feedback@jacksontetonplan.com.
The following public meetings have been scheduled
for early November:
Nov. 7, 6 to 8 p.m., St. John's Episcopal Church Parish Hall, 170 N. Glenwood
St. -- Clarion Associates, the Comp Plan consultant, plans to hold a public community
workshop. The objectives are to: share ideas about the working vision and goals;
define community character and preferences; and develop preliminary ideas for
land use concepts and alternatives.
Nov. 8, 10 a.m. to noon, 4-H Building, 255 W. Deloney Ave. -- Clarion Associates
will meet for the second time with the Comp Plan stakeholder advisory group.
Nov. 8, 3 to 5 p.m., County Commissioners’ Chambers, 200 S. Willow St.,
Jackson -- The Jackson Town Council and Teton Board of County Commissioners will
meet with Clarion Associates.
Nov. 8, 6 to 8 p.m., County Commissioners’ Chambers, 200 S. Willow St.,
Jackson -- Town and County Planning Commission members will meet with Clarion
Associates.
For more information on the Conservation Alliance’s
involvement in the Comp Plan update, contact Community
Planning Director Kristy Bruner at (307) 733-9417
or kristy@jhalliance.org.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
3) Decisions
Pending on Affordable Housing Requirements
To help alleviate Jackson Hole’s housing
crunch, the Town Council and Teton Board of County
Commissioners are moving toward increasing the
amount of deed-restricted affordable housing
developers are required to provide. At a joint
meeting on Sept. 10, the Teton County Housing
Authority asked commissioners and council members
to either enact an emergency ordinance to increase
the mitigation rate from 15 to 25 percent, or
begin writing new regulations to make the switch.
Since then, the two boards have considered the
proposal separately, and on Oct. 8, county planning
commissioners will make a recommendation, which
commissioners could vote on the next day. Jackson’s
Town Council has already voted to ask its planning
staff to draft an ordinance to change the rate
to 25 percent in the town’s land development
regulations.
The Conservation Alliance supports policies
that demand sufficient mitigation from developers
to offset one of the primary effects of rapid
growth -- a lack of affordable housing. It’s
high time to heed the 2007 Housing Needs Assessment
(available at www.tetonwyo.org/housing),
which recommends increasing the mitigation rate
to 40 percent. (For comparison, in Aspen, Colo.,
60 percent of new housing units are required
to be affordable.) The assessment also recommends
increasing the fees developers would have to
pay in lieu of providing affordable housing.
Substandard mitigation rates have caused pressure
to allow high-density spot zoning in inappropriate
places, risking our community’s wildlife
and rural character. For these reasons, the Alliance
supports efforts to increase mitigation and will
advocate for further commitment during the Comprehensive
Plan revision process.
Check www.jhalliance.org/monthly.htm for
dates and times of public meetings in October when
affordable housing is expected to be discussed.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
4) County
Postpones Grand Targhee Vote till Oct. 16
The Teton Board of County Commissioners met
Sept. 26 for what many thought would be the final
hearing on Grand Targhee’s bid for resort
zoning. But due to the absence of one commissioner,
and to the developer’s objections to conditions
of approval, the final vote has been put off
until 9 a.m. Oct. 16 at the Commissioners’ Chambers,
200 S. Willow St. (DUE TO APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL
CHANGES, THIS HEARING WAS CONTINUED TO DEC. 11,
SAME TIME & PLACE)
On Sept. 5, county commissioners set 11 conditions
to reduce the scope of proposed development at
Targhee. Major items included limiting the number
of lodging and employee units to 450, restricting
commercial and resort services to 120,000 square
feet, and establishing a fixed boundary to Targhee’s
120-acre site through a conservation easement
to prevent future expansion. The commissioners
failed to address concerns about air pollution
from wood-burning stoves and the lack of a density
cap, meaning that resort owners could be asking
for even more development rights within a few
years.
The developers argued that Grand Targhee won’t
make enough money if it has to comply with the
county’s conditions. However, the case
they presented for why Targhee needs 592 housing
units (not counting employee units) to be successful
looked only at ski lift ticket sales and operating
costs. It didn’t factor in anticipated
real estate sales, lift ticket price increases,
or revenues from an expected increase of summertime
visitors. Targhee’s model only lightly
addressed day-use skiers, and didn’t count
income from visiting skiers staying at accommodations
other than Targhee’s. In addition, resort
owner Geordie Gillett said he was considering
rescinding his previous offers of mitigation,
such as open space and a privately funded transportation
system, if commissioners don’t back down.
Targhee is surrounded by such pristine wildlands
that any development is bound to have serious off-site
impacts. Please support the commissioners’ stance
to limit development by emailing your comments
to commissioners@tetonwyo.org,
and by attending the Oct. 16 hearing. Background
information is available at:
www.jhalliance.org/Library/Perspectives/GrandTarghee.10-07.htm and
www.jhalliance.org/Library/PressReleases/GrandTarghee.6-07.htm.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
5) Local
Development Issues Abound
In addition to the above items, the Conservation
Alliance continues to monitor other county and
town private lands matters. Here is a brief roundup
of meetings at which you may share your concerns;
you may also email county comments to commissioners@tetonwyo.org.
(All times and dates are subject to change --
please call Teton County at (307) 733-8094 or
the Town of Jackson at (307) 734-3993 for confirmation.)
For more information on all community planning
issues, please contact Kristy Bruner at kristy@jhalliance.org or (307) 733-9417.
OSPREY CREEK (old Teton Village Road KOA) DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSAL -- Oct. 2, 9 a.m., County Commissioners’ Chambers,
200 S. Willow St., Jackson (THIS HEARING HAS
BEEN RESCHEDULED FOR NOV. 13)
This proposal, approved by the Planning Commission
in June, includes an amendment to rezone the
Osprey Creek property to a Planned Unit Development
for Affordable Housing district and to approve
its sketch plan. After receiving county commissioners’ feedback
this past summer, the developer has changed the
plan by moving all market lots and building envelopes
out of the Natural Resource Overlay, reducing
the number of units from 88 to 74 (36 market
and 38 affordable housing), and integrating the
affordable and market units. The Conservation
Alliance commends the developer for removing
development from the NRO, which is a designation
on town and county zoning maps that indicates
lands with special wildlife values, but questions
the long-term consequences of such a significant
upzone on a 15-acre parcel in an area intended
for low density.
NATURAL RESOURCE OVERLAY HABITAT MITIGATION --
Oct. 8, 6 p.m., County Commissioners Chambers,
200 S. Willow
The Teton County Planning Commission will discuss
an amendment to refine and clarify the habitat
mitigation requirements in the Natural Resource
Overlay. Currently, if developers disturb private
lands that the county has determined are critical
wildlife habitat, they're required to improve
habitat on other private land in
the county on a basis of two acres of habitat enhancement
for every one acre of disturbed NRO land. One of
the modifications being considered includes a questionable
alternative for developers to provide mitigation
on public lands, if "no reasonable options exist
to complete the required mitigation on private
land."
MINIMUM LOT SIZE AMENDMENT – Originally
scheduled for Sept. 25, this hearing was postponed
to Oct. 9, 9 a.m., County Commissioners’ Chambers,
200 S. Willow
Six years ago, Wyoming passed legislation that
allows landowners to subdivide parcels of 5 or
more acres into lots of any size for family members
for housing, business or agricultural needs.
However, this family subdivision exemption has
brought unintended consequences, including unchecked
density. As of July 3, 134 parcels have been
created in Teton County using the exemption.
(The average parcel size is 4.6 acres; the smallest
0.19 acres.)
In response, a county-level amendment has been
proposed to “support the use of minimum
lot or parcel size as a basic planning and zoning
tool.” (A similar county proposal failed
3-2 in March 2006.) Earlier this summer, Wyoming
enacted a requirement that family members must
hold the lot for five years before they can sell.
Locally, on May 15, county commissioners enacted
an emergency regulation that allows the planning
director to evaluate whether an applicant’s
use of the exemption is legitimate. The proposed
minimum lot size amendment will go a step further
by “closing the loophole that permits divisions
of land to create parcels well below lot sizes
permitted within the applicable zoning district.”
The Conservation Alliance supports efforts to
remedy some of the unintended consequences of
this exemption. As stated in the planning staff’s
report, “approval of this amendment would
enhance the protection of natural and scenic
resources by requiring all divisions of land
smaller than 35 acres to cluster development
and preserve open space, as intended by the Comprehensive
Plan.” While there are other options for
landowners to pursue higher densities (i.e.,
a planned residential development), they would
have to go through the planning process, unlike
subdivisions under the family exemption.
SNAKE RIVER CANYON RANCH -- Next hearing to
be determined
On Sept.11, county commissioners continued their
discussion on the Snake River Canyon Ranch’s
proposal for a master plan amendment. In general,
the application proposes a shift from a lodge-based
resort to a residential-scale development at
the old Astoria Hot Springs near Hoback Junction.
Planning staff did an excellent job of outlining
15 reasons that the application should be denied.
Commissioners voted 4-1 to send the application
back to the Planning Commission, suggesting that
the applicant should not have attempted to quickly
push such significant changes through the planning
process. No date has yet been set for the Planning
Commission hearing, and it’s unclear whether
the applicant is willing to modify the application.
In general, the Conservation Alliance questions
the following: the increase in disturbance to
Natural Resource Overlay lands (and inconsistencies
between the applicant’s and the environmental
assessment report’s estimate); the overall
change in the development pattern on the parcel
(and the net increase of nearly 145,000 square
feet of development); and the extent of development
slated to occur within the 150-foot setback
of the Snake River.
TETON MEADOWS RANCH (Seherr-Thoss property)
-- Hearings to be determined
The Conservation Alliance is in the preliminary
stages of analyzing a proposal to build a 500-unit
development on 288 acres of the Seherr-Thoss
property in South Park. The developer is seeking
a zoning change from Rural to NC-2 (under which
development of vacant land can only occur if
it’s considered to be “infill” between
existing subdivisions). The developer’s
stated primary goal is to “target all
homes and lots to the Jackson workforce, to
be sold at below-market prices to qualified
buyers.” In addition to the required
15 percent of affordable housing, the applicant
proposes donating lots to fulfill another 10
percent (described as “hybrid affordable”).
The remaining 75 percent is being promoted
as “homestead ownership,” a new
affordable-housing product. Under homestead
ownership, initial and future purchases of
these 375 units and/or lots would be restricted
by requirements such as: Buyers must work a
minimum of 1,500 hours a year in Teton County;
buyers may not own other property in Teton
County at the time of move-in; sellers must
occupy their home for at least two years before
selling; and building permits must be submitted
within three years of lot purchase. (In 2001,
the Teton County Housing Authority planned
to buy 329 acres of the same property and build
about 1,100 mostly affordable units on it,
but the sale fell through. At the time, opponents
questioned the “New Neighborhood” development’s
size and location in a rural area, given the
Comp Plan’s stipulation that dense development
be located near existing density to prevent
sprawl and traffic congestion.)
MARRIOTT PROJECT SPECIAL MEETING -- Oct.1, 11:30
a.m., Jackson Town Council Chambers, 150 E. Pearl
Ave.
The Town Council will hold a special meeting
with the Planning Commission and Design Review
Committee to discuss the Marriott project on
Oct. 1. Jicarilla Apache Real Estate Trust is
applying to build a more than 70,000-square-foot
Marriot hotel complex at Pearl and Broadway.
This past summer, the applicant proposed a land
development regulation amendment to allow the
maximum size for individual lodging structures
to be 75,000 square feet (through a conditional
use permit), as opposed to the current 35,000-square-foot
restriction. The Conservation Alliance opposed
the amendment because it didn’t
comply with the community’s clear vision
to minimize building scale to protect Jackson’s
character. On Aug. 20, the Town Council voted not
to approve it.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
6) WYDOT
Seeks Input on Hoback Junction Reconstruction
The Wyoming Department of Transportation will
hold an open house on its environmental assessment
of the proposed reconstruction of Hoback Junction
from 4:30 to 7:30 p.m., Oct. 9, at the WYDOT
office at 1040 Evans Rd., south of Jackson. WYDOT
wants to reconfigure the unsafe intersection
of Highways 26/89 and 189/191 to either a “T” or
a roundabout, and rebuild the 60-year-old bridge
just southwest of this intersection. This is
the first of three phases planned under the Hoback
Highway reconstruction project. Work on the other
two segments -- South Jackson to Hoback and East
of Hoback -- will follow.
You can download the Hoback Junction EA at www.dot.state.wy.us (click
on Information Central, then Manuals and Publications,
then Environmental Documents, then Hoback Junction
EA). Comments on the EA are due by Oct. 26 and
may be emailed to hobackcomments@dot.state.wy.us,
faxed to (307) 777-4193, or mailed to Mr. Timothy
Stark, Wyoming Department of Transportation,
Environmental Services, P.O. Box 1708, Cheyenne,
WY 82003-1708.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
7) County
to Reconsider Bear-Proof Trash Containers
Drought conditions, a shortage of berries and
acorns, and increased development in bear country
have driven bears to town in search of food,
escalating conflicts with people. Wyoming Game
and Fish officials say they expect the number
of incidents to reach 150 this year -- more than
the past five years combined.
In response, Teton County commissioners will review
a revised amendment they hope will reduce bear-human
conflicts at 9 a.m. on Oct. 9 at the Commissioners’ Chambers,
200 S. Willow. (THIS MATTER HAS BEEN TABLED UNTIL
OCT. 23, SAME TIME AND PLACE.) In September 2006,
Teton County passed “Phase 1” amendments,
which included requirements for all property owners
to have bear-resistant trash containers. But this
requirement was not enforceable because it didn’t
specify standards for the containers. To help remedy
this and other problems, the Wyoming Game and Fish
Department and Teton County have collaborated on
a new amendment to refine bear-protection measures.
The Bear Conflict Mitigation and Prevention Amendment
establishes garbage, landscaping and bear-attractant
standards as a condition of approval for new development
proposals. The stringency of these standards varies
depending on which “conflict priority area” (among
three proposed areas based on Game and Fish data)
the development falls in. The Conservation Alliance
strongly supports and commends these proactive
efforts to minimize conflicts with bears. For more
information, please visit www.tetonwyo.org/plan and
click on the link in the Announcement box.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
8) Forest
Planning Rule Comments Due by Oct. 22
A draft environmental impact statement on the
Forest Planning Rule, released in August, will
determine how the current Bridger-Teton National
Forest management plan revision will proceed.
The preferred alternative (virtually identical
to the Bush administration’s 2005 Planning
Rule, which a district court judge tossed out
in March) would significantly reduce protective
measures, scientific rigor and public input on
Forest Service plans.
The DEIS is available at www.fs.fed.us/emc/nfma/2007_planning_rule.html.
The Conservation Alliance believes that preferred
Alternative A will NOT ensure a planning process
that will protect our irreplaceable national
forests and wildlife. Page iii of the DEIS provides
comments made during scoping by people critical
of Alternative A. Charts comparing the alternatives
are on Pages 28 to 38. Significantly, at the
bottom of Page 36 it says it would be “typical” under
Alternative A for officials to “categorically
exclude” proposed projects on the forest
from the requirements of the National Environmental
Policy Act. In our comments, we’ll advocate
for Alternative B, which would reinstate the
more environmentally responsible 2000 Planning
Rule.
If you’d like to discuss ways to make your
comments effective, please contact Alliance Public
Lands Director Louise Lasley at (307) 733-9417
or louise@jhalliance.org.
Comments are due by Oct 22 and may be emailed to planningrule@fscomments.org,
faxed to (916) 456-6742 or mailed to Planning Rule
Comments, P.O. Box 162969, Sacramento, CA 95816-2969.
Remember, we can best express our respect and appreciation
for Jackson Hole’s natural wonders -- diversity
of wildlife, scenic beauty, pristine air and water
-- by participating in the public processes that
determine how the lands around us will be managed.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
9) Sen.
Barrasso Pledges to Protect Wyoming Range,
Snake Headwaters
On Sept. 10, in his first major speech on the
Senate floor, U.S. Sen. John Barrasso promised
to work to restrict energy development on the Wyoming
Range and to gain Wild and Scenic Rivers Act protection
for Snake River headwaters. The late U.S. Sen.
Craig Thomas, whom Barrasso replaced, introduced
a bill in May to include about 400 miles of rivers
and streams in northwest Wyoming in the National
Wild and Scenic Rivers System. At the time of his
death in June, Sen. Thomas was also planning to
introduce legislation to limit oil and gas drilling
on the Wyoming Range of the Bridger-Teton National
Forest. “While [Sen. Thomas] is not here
to carry on the work, the work needs to continue
as part of his legacy,” Sen. Barrasso said,
adding that he will soon introduce a bill “to
protect the undeveloped areas of the Wyoming Range
from any future oil and gas leasing.” (Read
the Fall 2007 Alliance News, available at www.jhalliance.org/library.htm for background information on these two items.)
Please send a note of support to Sen. Barrasso
at senator_jbarrasso@barrasso.senate.gov or
307 Dirkson Senate Office Building, Washington,
D.C. 20510, (202) 224-6441.
Also, please also urge the other two members
of Wyoming’s congressional delegation to
likewise honor Sen. Thomas’ legacy:
Sen. Mike Enzi -- 379 Russell Senate Office Building,
Washington, D.C. 20510, (202) 224-3424,
Email via: http://enzi.senate.gov/email.htm
Rep. Barbara Cubin -- 1114 Longworth, HOB, Washington,
D.C. 20515, (202) 225-2311,
Email via: http://www.house.gov/cubin/zip_auth.html
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
10) Heli-Skiing
Controversy Continues
To protect the Palisades Wilderness Study Area
and support federal environmental review policies,
in February the Conservation Alliance, Greater
Yellowstone Coalition, Earthjustice, Sierra Club
and Wyoming Wilderness Association negotiated
with the National Forest Service and High Mountain
Heli-skiing for a transitional decrease in heli-skiing
to legally mandated 1984 levels by 2010. This
gradual decrease in use over four years would
allow the company to move its operations to alternative
terrain and result in heli-skiing numbers that
would not endanger the Palisades’ Wilderness
Study Area status.
Despite agreeing to this court-ordered compromise,
both the Forest Service and High Mountain Heli-skiing
have since filed appeals, and in September, High
Mountain Heli-skiing filed its legal arguments.
Stay tuned for more on this as it progresses. For
background information, please visit www.jhalliance.org/issues.htm and click on “Heli-skiing and Wilderness.”
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
11) Upcoming
Events
The Conservation Alliance is a co-sponsor of
two forums to help educate voters about
elected officials’ views on conservation
issues and encourage discussion on local governments’ efforts
to manage growth and its impacts:
TUESDAY, Oct.
9, 7 p.m., County Commissioners’ Chambers,
200 S. Willow
Wyoming Conservation Voters Education Fund & Teton
County Commissioners Public "Civic Engagement"
Forum
WEDNESDAY, Oct. 10, 7 p.m., County Commissioners’ Chambers,
200 S. Willow
Wyoming Conservation Voters Education Fund & Jackson
Town Council Public "Civic Engagement" Forum
WEDNESDAY, Oct. 17, Noon at the Conservation
Alliance, 685 S. Cache St.
Info Lunch: “Flight of the Whooping Crane”
Please join us for a showing of renowned photographer
Tom Mangelsen’s film “Flight of the
Whooping Crane.” (Technical difficulties
interfered with our originally scheduled showing
in July.) This Emmy-nominated, National Geographic
film chronicles the plight of these endangered
birds and the efforts to bring them back from
the brink of extinction. As cinematographer and
associate producer, Mangelsen created the film
in hopes of furthering awareness of the dangers
facing this species that at one time lived in
Jackson Hole. He's planning to join us, so this
should be a great behind-the-scenes opportunity!
The film begins at noon in the Alliance conference
room. Bring lunch, and we will provide drinks
and snacks.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
12) Valley
Echoes
“Cities have the capability
of providing something for everybody,
only because, and only when, they are created
by everybody.”
- Jane Jacobs, writer and activist
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
Alliance Action is a publication of the Jackson
Hole Conservation Alliance. The Jackson Hole
Conservation Alliance is dedicated to responsible
land stewardship in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, to
ensure that human activities are in harmony with
the area’s irreplaceable wildlife, scenic,
and other natural resources. The Alliance is
a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) organization.
(If you no longer wish to receive this e-newsletter,
please send a note saying you’d like us to
remove your email address from our list to: allianceaction@jhalliance.org.)
|